|
|
|||
|
THE PHOTOGRAPHS
|
33
|
||
|
|
|||
|
duced by the particles which have been charged during the
whole of their journey. If the junction occurs at a consider- able distance from the head of the primary, care has to be
taken in some cases to avoid confusing the secondaries with
primaries corresponding to a different value of ejm. Thus, for example, if the shape of the secondary and primary were |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FIG. 23.
similar to that shown in Fig. 23*2, and the point of junction
came off the plate, the appearance on the plate would be that represented in Fig. 23$, and the secondary might be mistaken for a primary with a value of e\m less than the true value. If the magnetic field overlapped the electric field on the camera |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FIG. 24.
side of the apparatus, the primary and secondary would re-
semble Fig. 23^, and if the right hand part were off the plate, the curves would look like Fig. 246 and the secondary might be mistaken for a primary with a value of e/m greater than the true value. This possible confusion of a secondary with a primary line is a point which requires careful attention when
3
|
|||
|
|
|||